A Successful Methanol Treatment in a Gas-Condensate Reservoir: Field Application

TitleA Successful Methanol Treatment in a Gas-Condensate Reservoir: Field Application
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2003
AuthorsAl-Anazi, H. A., J. G. Walker, G. A. Pope, M. M. Sharma, and D. F. Hackney
Conference NameSPE Production and Operations Symposium
Date Published03/2003
PublisherSociety of Petroleum Engineers
Conference LocationOklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S.A., March 23-25, 2003
ISBN Number978-1-55563-967-9
Other NumbersSPE 80901-MS
KeywordsCondensate Banking / Productivity of Gas Condensate Wells, Formation Damage
Abstract

A field test was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of methanol as a solvent for removing condensate banks that form when pressure in the near wellbore region falls below the dewpoint. Core flood experiments on Texas Cream Limestone and Berea cores show that condensate accumulation can cause a severe decline in gas relative permeability, especially in the presence of high water saturation. This can result in well productivity declining by a factor of 3 to 5 as bottom hole pressure declines below the dewpoint. PVT analysis performed on field samples taken from the Hatter's Pond field in Alabama indicate retrograde condensate behavior. These high-temperature deep gas wells show low gas productivity and large skin. A preliminary analysis of the data indicated the possibility of condensate and water blocking due to the loss of water-based drilling fluids. Core samples were used to measure gas relative permeability. Compatibility tests were conducted to ensure that the injection of filtrate and methanol did not cause any damage to the core. Since the formation brine is very saline, tests were conducted to check for salt precipitation during methanol injection. Based on these laboratory results and a single-well numerical simulation, a field test was conducted. The well chosen for treatment was producing 250 MSCFPD with 87 BPD of condensate. A thousand barrels of methanol was pumped down the tubing at a rate of 5 to 8 B/min. Gas production increased by a factor of 3 initially and stabilized at about 500 MSCFPD. Condensate production doubled to 157 BPD. The well shows a skin of -1.9 after methanol treatment. The increase in gas and condensate production was observed to persist more than 10 months after the treatment.

Several possible explanations are provided for the positive results obtained in this test. Some general conclusions are made for the design for future treatments.

DOI10.2118/80901-MS